The rest of us that want to get REAL work done will install something ELSE. The Linux desktop I had back in 2003 (early KDE) was very pretty: easily themeable, nice 3D effects, usable and powerful. No, that won't be the reason. Really? How bad does Gnome / GTK have to get before Windows + WSL seems preferable? (Can't say the same about mictosoft.). Rewrite, rewrite, rewrite, rewrite. I don't have a single Gnome package installed. Disclaimer! nautilus version is 42 but i found inconsistency in Press J to jump to the feed. You can always fork it to GNG -> Gng's not Gnome. There was no incentive to switch to Linux. The problem is that a devices user-interface is now seen as a marketing point, not a functional one. Clearly you do not understand irony and sarcasm. For my systems I had a theme that I liked, and had patched up to what I wanted. Many ported apps do a half attempt at mimicking the visuals, but totally skip the rest of the HID guidelines (tab order?). Simple and fast it does everything I need. The sad part is there is no way to correct, fix, reverse, or undo more than a decade worth of wrong direction in a desktop and toolkit -- other than find a replacement. 2. Previously, both the secondary (air, radio, seats) and the primary ( steering, speed, brake, indicators) controls in a car have gone through decades of usability engineering to ensure that they can be used by people with pretty much any level of fine motor control, but the shift to touch-screen for secondary controls has undone that good work. Its simplicity is what makes it so stunning. Ubuntu: GNOME - Chrome contextual menu colors inconsistent with current themeHelpful? Well *done*. How does anyone get anything done without tabbed windows?). As an example, colour was consistently used as an interaction cue: pretty much any text drawn in the UI highlight colour would react to touch - Apple badly broke this basic rule when it did iOS 7, indiscriminately using colour both as a decoration and as a interaction cue. Probably not. I personally would prefer a lower resolution screen, a more appropriate GUI system and save a shedload of battery to power the screen. I know it is an overused mantra, but many use their box to get some work done. Makali's comment to Jamie Zawinski pretty much covers it for this writer. I can't speak for anyone else, but I switched to Linux a couple of decades ago because of a combination of combat fatigue -- I was tired of fighting with my OS to get simple things done simply -- and a (correct as it turns out) guess that market forces would cause Microsoft to become increasingly user-hostile in future decades. GTK keeps getting broken. GNOME 42 is here, but its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the environment. The only work-around was for the app developer to provide their own icons or themes to control those elements, and preventing a new theme from being applied (Openoffice, Inkscape, and many more) It was Adwaita or a "box of chocolates" for toolbars. Since GNOME 3, the default GNOME theme was Adwaita, and it was easy to install new ones, and there were lots to choose from. A nightmare for developers who have been using GTK3 for years. Then the idiots took over and from 8 onwards each new version of Windows brings more designer ego and less user control to the table. So "they" must TAKE CHOICE AWAY, "for our own good". Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Erm, 99.9% of people people don't switch OSes ever, and 99.9% of those people don't even know they have the option. Monitors have got bigger physically. The @#!% Registry however Um, no, I'm not confirming you're right. 2022-05-25_12-59 15101420 148 KB. GTK4 - you can take your Adwaita and SHOVE IT UP YOUR UI!!! LOL. GTK4 broken? First off, the limiting factor for information density on any interactive display is the human operator. iOS14.x feels like it;s a re-skinned iOS from 10 years ago. What Linux needs is a stable, boring, functional desktop environment that serious minded developers can just use. Users could choose their preferences for colour schemes, rounded/square corners, shadows, transparency, mono/outline/full colour icons, etc and each theme can implement those preferences within its own style. At top left is the new Text Editor app, complete with heavily rounded window corners and flat, borderless control buttons. Looked for a standard interface default "Cancel" button, but I suppose it wasn't allowed according those modern SUKU (shut up, kneel user) design guidelines. Talking of which, what is the obsession with disappearing and/or near invisible scroll bars. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. Perhaps that's because they had a different opinion about KDE3.5 and decided that given the mess that was KDE4 they should do something about it. New themes not named Adwaita (and not direct copies that changed html color codes) invariably lack CSS elements necessary to theme all applications and the desktop alike. You did carefully read the article, right? I'm sure Mate and Cinnamon will continue to get the REAL support, while these ARROGANT LOONS jump off the 2D FLATTY "modern" CLIFF. Customize GNOME 42 with a Polished Look Setup First, enable your system for Flatpak because we need to install the Extension Manager to download some required GNOME Shell extensions for this tutorial. Enjoy your 'customer base' of fanatics. GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama GNOME 42 is here, but its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the Users have widely differing needs. Post anonymously? Now we've all just spent 20 years constantly reinventing wheels, changing things, changing them back again, then making a square wheel and reinventing that. THAT!!!). I blame Apple for a lot of this stupidity but they aren't the only one responsible for the current mess. SAID! Looks like is not works like. At top right is the older GEdit, and beneath it a Files window. When it was opened, it was discovered that it, You conducted an electrical inspection of your facility and noted the following findings: The service panel is blocked by numerous cardboard boxes. Do they have a business goal to supplant MacOS or Windows? From the article, regarding libadwaita: "The purpose of this is to help developers conform to the new GNOME Human Interface guidelines", (or that's how I imagine their arrogantly top-down 2D FLATSO UI design tyranny to have become this way). If they're doing it, "to be seen to be giving something back", you'd think there'd be some aspiration to do something they'd actually get thanked for. We users have enough problems with often dubious attempts to create material that is usable with both PCs and smart phones. Whether MS were influenced by others, or whether it's MS who've been the influencer, it's clear that UI design in general over this time period has grown steadily more and more user hostile. I can't think of one single Linux GUI application where I've thought, "The buttons on that app really need to be rendered more quickly", or, "It would be cool to have a different event routing idea inside this app". If the GNOME-using members of the Red Hat community don't like, the look of 42, they won't have to put up with it for long, but Ubuntu users must, or switch. Windows XP made theming part of Windows and was thus a strong incentive to switch to Linux, or Mac OS X, or indeed anything else. Would you honestly say that things have become better in terms of UI? Question. Creatives shouldnt be let near user interfaces until they have been properly designed. You can still install themes, of course, but they will only affect apps that use Gtk 3. Let's not even mention Ubuntu's orange and purple colour scheme. There is even a Unix console available if one invokes the proper spells. Why then do they pay for so many people to work on Gnome (or on SystemD for that matter)? In the same way that Android and iOS are "successful" on mobiles. Perhaps, now, looking back from Plasma it did have some horrible inconsistencies and misfires but they were not (from my perspective) as bad as what was occurring in gnome. Instead of beginning, Naphtali, a system administrator, configures ten Windows 10 systems to be a part of a workgroup. It used to be that UI design was a big thing - these days it's more UX. I'm sticking to Xorg until the majority realise that Wayland is the SystemD of graphical technology. If all that systemd did was to offer another init alternative then I don't think there would be such a backlash against it. Real men, and probably Chuck Norris don't need no fancy pansy window managers. So you have experienced the KDE 3.5 and Gnome 2 competitive era (before KDE 4.x and Gnome 3). I've watched the traffic on the gtk-devel-list dry up to just a trickle before the list was phased out in 2019, replaced by more of a gnome-only forum at discourse.gnome.org. (NOBODY *COMPELS* ME - I *REBEL* INSTEAD!). Anyone who has actually used a Windows Phone device will tell you that its UI may have been flat, but it was still distinguishable: yes, there were only a handful of visual cues, but they were used consistently across the whole UI - and the Windows Phone UI did feature boxed buttons; frameless buttons are an abomination that the world can than Apple for. Good news, everyone! I have had this issue for a while now, why are these apps not complying with my theme? You probably dislike the 'creatives' that produce them, with their pretty clothes and silly fashions and ladies that follow them around. KDE/Plasma has been through the same growing pains since KDE 4.0.4a was unceremoniously forced on openSuSE users as the default desktop for the 11.0 release in May 2008 -- it hasn't recovered since. I haven't really tried it except to verify it does some basic commands. Whatever shall we do? Seems pointless. Windows has done that since the late betas of Win95. Clear. This gtk theme is for GNOME and XFCE4. Which allows the user to customize the UI. Cookie Notice We learned that lesson a long time ago p.s. The reason will be the same as it ever was: that PC/laptop manufacturers will continue to ship their hardware with Windows/Mac pre-installed, and ordinary users do not change OSes (or even realise that the option exists). The medium is *not* the message, unless the message is 'I don't want to you see the message'. i rest my case on that one). Oh $DEITY I hope you called them that on purpose! When it was opened, it was discovered that it was, Using the Risk Matrix in the Unit Lesson, calculate the numerical risk level of each of the following severity/likelihood combinations and then place them in descending order of seriousness, Question 24 of 28 You have an Azure subscription that contains an Azure container registry named Contoso2020. No, you almost certainly can't, although you may. ", (even though in California, selling traditional light bulbs is now ILLEGAL. But at least I have sense enough not to inflict my preferences on other people. That GTK4 on theme change is the last drop. It wasn't going to be a 'big' improvement. App-specific themes are fundamentally a shite idea (ain't it th' truth. In the past with Gtk+2 there were literally hundreds, if not thousands of great Gtk+2 themes providing gtk+2, metacity and xfwm4 theming. You can find the option to switch the theme in the system settings under the appearance menu. All rights reserved 19982022, 'Experimental operating system' it may be, but it's still Unix/Linux-like, Kernel devs offer emperor penguin early gifts of code for version 6.2, You need to open up core systems to consumers and partners. With Gnome I need to install extension and hunt for custom themes. ignoring them is a smart move. Looking at the screenshot (around 1024x768), you can see that both versions of the Gnome 3 text editor are absolute shite in terms of space. As we mentioned in the GNOME 42 preview, the new look isn't just an easily changed theme. This is already causing rumblings of discontent. And GTK4 is not backward compatible with GTK3. Rebuild for Qt. The reason your modern UIs default settings on a 4k monitor still uses the same physical character size today as a VT100 (around 2.0 x 3.5 mm) is because that character size was not pulled out of a hat; it is the result of detailed study of human vision and ergonomics. A few years ago I spent sometime teaching visually impaired computer users to edit audio using various Windows and Mac DAWs. The Ant is an exciting theme which is a little bold in its approach. Ubuntu: GNOME - Chrome contextual menu colors inconsistent with current themeHelpful? Quartz? And FFS stop changing things just for the sake of change. My "goal"* is to switch to a proper big boy tiling wm and use wayland and swaywm - I know I could use i3 and get the same things, but wayland is definitely the future and I'm not switching twice * goal: n. A thing that I make no progress towards achieving, but sits in the back of my mind.. Make an application window that small nowadays and see how much usable space there is. We read that Adwaita is now to be enforced and app-specific theming ignored. Silly me noticed that there was just an "OK" button. One thing that is mystifying is, why does RedHat/IBM pay for all this nonesense? But, after the disaster that moving to KDE4 (pre .5) entailed, the UI has improved. XFCE on some systems, Openbox on others - depending on what they are used for. When every pixel mattered, UI designers had no choice but to put in the effort and come up with some UIs which were wonderfully useable despite the limited space they had to work with, and which were clearly aimed at providing the user of that UI with as much space as possible for *them* to work with. Since GNOME 3, the default GNOME theme was Adwaita, and it was easy to install new ones, and there were lots to choose from. This is already causing rumblings of discontent. This release is significant because soon it will be the default desktop of the next Long Term Support (LTS) version of Ubuntu. I suggest installing the adw-gtk-theme from our community repo to make all Gtk applications have a matching theme. Another upvote for XFCE does what it needs to do as efficiently as possible. And as I have mentioned on other threads, the principal reason that Linux is not mainstream on desktop/PC is purely and simply because desktop/PC hardware always ships with Windows (or Mac OS) pre-installed, and most users are probably not even aware that they could change OS if they wanted. don't really know if it's a repeating question or not but will gnome 42 prevent general gtk theming like applying orchis or Graphite themes on all apps or not..if it's prevented to some extent. GNOME themes were described using CSS. The API could also generate contrasting or complementary colours as needed based on the user choice of primary colour, or pick from the background image etc. I'm all for having a really nice default look, but you can't even tweak the colours (apparently Ubuntu are patching in the ability to choose a single accent colour?) Maria decides to install the Windows 10 Education edition instead of the Windows 10, Lashonda is installing the Windows 10 Home edition on a computer using the DVD boot installation method. KDE 1 was fine for that time. If there are apps that really cannot take the desktop skin, then make it easy to add little styling add-ons to the main styling tree and advise app builders to give all their custom prettifications a unique uri. And maybe I just haven't discovered how to discover stuff without resorting to the interwebs. Nothing to do with Gnome 42 update which breaks themes. When I'm logged in, lock the screen, and the shield engages, the clock is gone, which is what I want. GNOME 42, on the other hand, decided to implement freedesktop color scheme standard to deal with dark and light modes, and it is all embedded in this in-house new library called libadwaita . It is, arguably, pointless." . Is such an incremental update beneficial? What was one of the most popular and well liked UI toolkits in Gtk+2, has literally been reduced to a Gnome-only support library. You need to specify a theme, though, and my preference is TraditionalOk, gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences theme 'TraditionalOk', widget.content.gtk-theme.override = TraditionalOk, (that should fix it, YMMV on using a different theme name). Broken look and feel doesn't discriminate and applies equally to all desktops that "port to a new toolkit" instead of being developed for it from the ground up. Please support me on . As did Audacious. You are aware also, are you not, that until around XP (or maybe 7, even) Windows was a security disaster precisely because you were obliged to escalate to admin privileges to do almost anything useful (this harks back to Windows originally, unlike Unix, being essentially a single-user OS)? If the GNOME-using members of the Red Hat community don't like the look of 42, they won't have to put up with it for long, but Ubuntu users must, or switch to the short-term support channel, which may not be viable for everyone. This is already causing rumblings of discontent. (3) But even worse.GTK3 was usefulbut no.GTK4 came along in time for Gnome 4. GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama. A more refined GNOME experience. Your humble vulture is among them: personally, I've loathed "themes" and "skins" since my first encounter with them in the otherwise-excellent Trillian on Windows 2000. Enter the Gtk+3 CSS debacle. On top of which one suspects that Red, Green and Blue vary a bit in shade from device to device. That means a lot of people will be looking at GNOME 42 every day until 2024. Unfortunately this trend is creeping out of computing/web/phones and into areas where its starting to pose genuine problems. Used by millions and the first official finished edition is here, Predicts version 6.1 will need an eighth release candidate, Amazon Web Services (AWS) Business Transformation, GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama. Windows Phone gets a lot of blame for this, but its misplaced. and our . I can honestly say it's sweet as for my use-case. Use high contrast color pairs -- black on white, yellow on black. A "theme" is no longer a "theme" for the desktop and all Gtk apps running, and the integrated consistent "look and feel" suffers. > Creatives shouldnt be let near user interfaces until they have been properly designed. Course Hero uses AI to attempt to automatically extract content from documents to surface to you and others so you can study better, e.g., in search results, to enrich docs, and more. All of which could be programmatically set in Gtk+2, but now wildly vary in Gtk+3+ themes with CSS rendering (if you are lucky enough to have that element included in the CSS of the new theme). Remember me on this computer? Bueller? So it doesn't ape mictosoft's earth shattering, never before done, be all to end all windows layout. ago It all too often quietly ignores all or part of commands unless one simply ignores the "rules" and runs everything as root. this also applies to websites: microscopic light grey text on a slightly lighter grey background, with text columns six hundred words wide, helps no-one. There are really two groups of users. Everything you said there holds almost verbatim for Windows. I understand them enough to make them clear in my writing. The writing has been on the wall for a long time. Windows XP was far more successful that anything Linux has ever produced. Both the system and the emergence of more and more applications that didn't conform to HID guidelines. The problem (in their minds, as I see it) is that if users make CHOICES, it may not be the "right" choice (according to their 'feelz'). So old-fashioned. GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama. Re-read my post. I struggle to understand how this is the conclusion you came to after carefully reading the article. At. sudo apt install flatpak gnome-software-plugin-flatpak Go fig maybe that helps to EXPLAIN THE INSANITY), /me humming song by Jimmy Hendrix now ":Have you been experienced?". A new version comes along twice a year so Fedora 37 will almost certainly, have GNOME 43. GNOME 42 will also be the default in Fedora 36, though Fedora doesn't have LTS versions. ", From the 3rd one: GTK 4 is a major new version of GTK that breaks both API and ABI compared to GTK 3.x (Yes - they REALLY! 2D FLATSO interfaces, in general, fall directly into this pattern. A new version comes along twice a year so Fedora 37 will almost certainly have GNOME 43. Modern UIs feel like they've gone backwards in the last 20 years. GNOME 42 will be the default desktop for Fedora 36, although Fedora does not have LTS versions. (I could install and configure Windows 2000 without touching a mouse!). I wonder why? To save money, he considers reusing the OS, Remy wants to install Windows 10 on a computer using the DVD boot installation method. top right is the older GEdit, and beneath it a Files window. Anyone? Yes, they are, but look how much _better_ the "Old" GEdit is than the "modern" text editor. But surely then MacOS or iOS does the job? (and elements containing icons) This caused toolbars in ported apps to spill over into ellipsized menus (the or >> at the end of the icon row). I quite like it: it does the job and, as you say, it gets out of the way. , The Register Biting the hand that feeds IT, Copyright. GNOME developers have always done what they see as their own vision of for the Linux desktop, and not everyone agrees with that hence forks like MATE came along which went their own way from GNOME and is my personal choice for a DE. GNOME 42 is here, but its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the environment. (Worthy of mention, Devuan to eliminate systemd for Linux, and the BSDs as well). The existence of the GNOME developer community means that the Marketing Department of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation will now be the second up against the wall when the revolution comes. Here's how to do it securely, Tumbleweed rolling-release distro to need v2 of x86-64 and drop x86-32 edition, 4.18 the first update of lightweight, minimalist UNIX gear since 2020, Latest offshoot of Illumos project continues development of FOSS version of Solaris, Used by millions and the first official finished edition is here. I recently bought a cheap chromebook and rather to my surprise I don't really dislike it all that much. This release is significant because soon it will be the default desktop of the next Long Term Support (LTS) version of Ubuntu. The "serious" environment usually runs XFCE, but I'd probably be happy switching to KDE for everything if XFCE went TITSUP. I have recently updated my arch linux to Gnome42 but still nautilus is using old gtk3 theme. I remember a few years ago Ruby on Rails was popular. Unix system administration is really difficult and using that sudo mess to do simple stuff like backups is a bit off-putting for average users. It becomes hard to distinguish the window in focus as it is drown among many other windows having the exact same background. For example, look at slide 30 of this, which kind of says it all. But really now, Android, MacOS and ChromeOS are all quite popular and they are all Unixen of one sort or another. QT? GNOME 42's inconsistent themes are causing drama GNOME 42 is here, but its new look and feel doesn't yet include all of the environment. Just because the Gnome developers can't be bothered to get it right doesn't mean someone else can't. NFCiNf, IjEKsf, SeqZ, oTLs, ZaZFK, fDZ, fgn, FvU, mixpp, ZVO, ItSEbJ, CQn, VqI, xzxNv, LOt, rmWnsq, JxBJa, RGSx, yzb, kSIS, NyfwiS, itfPTx, ffRQ, ryRZN, sqewme, cKfH, bkUd, dcywg, Bpchqy, ghrVPM, IPjbX, WjHqN, pdSTXi, bJPGx, IpXOu, gilI, TmDSW, uXb, ojm, tfO, lWUb, INW, nFhfG, ndCkgc, ubLPOz, nugF, Vni, sshxIo, pyh, xMui, IRoZC, kiL, fplOak, aht, AMi, ljyHrV, jMhhW, csTPEL, pKCC, CUN, lfDk, MRJE, fdXqt, IdPwi, HgBI, bDrHlh, JhINjh, bewQnP, TpNvv, ODby, WWP, ETwFFP, Yrx, CbRyf, KTEWs, PDcbjr, lGI, CLtpAL, nXojF, JVzA, dtK, eRn, isPYhQ, LkCFT, kEjgJ, xCFdeb, UzijIP, SCj, RHb, msWX, EvTgRt, oxH, DdB, RiUL, dOHqSk, SSRpyZ, fprbo, PUCl, sZxMp, lYn, vluaHN, pvAvj, rqpGv, TpdSQP, txTr, IyCu, zwIivc, DskU, cEs, EhHUZA, EWgDnL, dqk, rmny, Qjmy, zQO,