Some of their assets listed in a forfeiture count of the indictment were restrained under a protective order prior to trial. at 1415-1416. In the last two decades, the GOP has greatly increased and entrenched . 9:40. [18], This opinion was authored by Justice Samuel Alito and was supported by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Kennedy and Thomas. In McNeely the defendant was pulled over for traffic violations, appeared intoxicated, and did poorly on field sobriety tests. 1409, 1418-1420. Leadership Spotlight: Stuck in Autopilot? The hearing was held on April 16, 2013, and reversed a ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court.[15]. ; National Federation of Independent Business et al. Our starting point for choosing which cases to watch this year came from articles published by major news organizations at the start of the term. The case from Wisconsin has the potential to radically reorder politics in America. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. holding: a federal employee who claims that an agency action appealable to the merit systems protection board violates an antidiscrimination statute listed in 5 u.s.c. The Supreme Court also will be taking up a major Second Amendment case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen, which deals with a New York law that limits a person's ability to carry concealed guns. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. CNN.com, "Big cases await Supreme Court's 2012-2013 term", Supreme Court of the United States, Audio: United States v. Windsor, Supreme Court of the United States, Audio: Hollingsworth v. Perry, Supreme Court of the United States, Shelby County v. Holder, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Supreme Court of the United States, Audio: Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, Supreme Court of the United States, Audio: Vance v. Ball State University, Supreme Court of the United States, Audio: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, Supreme Court of the United States, 12-71. FBI.gov is an official site of the U.S. government, U.S. Department of Justice. Public Docket Search for Supreme Court of Ohio Cases Case Number: - Entering a complete case number will open the docket view for that case when you click search. We have never before upheld the standing of a private party to defend the constitutionality of a state statute when state officials have chosen not to. The Maryland statute, with limitations on the collection and use of DNA obtained from arrestees, is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment.25. Salinas was a suspect in the shotgun murders of two brothers. We decline to do so for the first time here. ; and Department of Health and Human Services et al. Under the State Supreme Court's reading, a biological Indian father could abandon his child in uteroand then could play his ICWA trump card at the eleventh hour to override the mother's decision and the child's best interest. The highest courts of Alabama and Arkansas upheld the sentences. California appealed to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court opened its 2012 term Oct. 1, having agreed to consider the smallest number of cases in many years. The new Supreme Court is getting interesting, and we don't mean abortion, guns, and race. While expressly limiting the ruling to the facts of that case, the Schmerber Court held that the police officer there reasonably might have believed he was confronted with an emergency in which the delay necessary to obtain a warrant under the circumstances threatened the destruction of evidence because the human body functions to eliminate alcohol from the system.15 The Schmerber Court noted that the determination an exigency existed was made under the particular facts of that casenotably, that time already had been taken to bring the defendant to a hospital for treatment and to investigate the scene of the accident.16. JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KAPPOS, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, MATCH-E-BE-NASH-SHE-WISH BAND OF POTTAWATOMI INDIANS. For further exploration of or information about the major cases heard by the Supreme Court in 2012, please visit the rulings included under the cases below. The Sacketts filed a lawsuit, but the lower courts dismissed it, holding that until the EPA undertakes an enforcement action, the suit was premature. Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar. During the 2012 to 2013 term, the Supreme Court decided a number of cases of interest to the law enforcement community, including several involving the Fourth Amendment. Friday, May 11, 2012. Leadership Spotlight: How Do You Live Your Dash? Leadership Spotlight: Are You An Approachable Leader? [28], Justice Clarence Thomas authored a 9-0 decision holding that a naturally occurring segment of DNA cannot be patented though it can be isolated. [19], This opinion, regarding affirmation action in the admissions policy of the University of Texas, was remanded to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Several advisory bodies assist with this . The interview lasted about an hour. CARACO PHARMACEUTICAL LABORATORIES, LTD., DOUGLAS, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES. Description: In Florida v. 2012). The case dates back to February 2012, when a 19-year-old girl's body was found in Haryana . Synthetic DNA is still eligible to patent. Salinas also agreed to voluntarily accompany police to the station for questioning. The tests and devices that blocked ballot access have been forbidden nationwide for over 40 years. Welcome to FindLaw's searchable database of U.S. Supreme Court decisions since 1760. 2388 (2013). Click here to contact our editorial staff, and click here to report an error. Leadership Spotlight: How Do We Lead from Here? Florida v. Jardines,133 S.Ct. But, without an express invocation, the government is left to guess at the reason for the witness silence. This case will address the unanswered question left by the Supreme Courts ruling in Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006). NATALIE E. TENNANT, WEST VIRGINIA SECRETARY OF STATE, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS. *Pay $1.50 for the first 22 weeks of . The principal seat of the Supreme Court is at Waigani in the capital, Port Moresby. SCOTUSblog, Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. SCOTUSblog, "Opinion recap: Global wiretap challenge thwarted," February 26, 2013, https://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php?title=Major_cases_of_the_Supreme_Court_October_2012_term&oldid=7954800. 03-02-2012. To read about major cases heard in other terms, click on the following links: 2013, 2014, and 2015. Id. 7Florida v. Harris, 133 S.Ct. The Supreme Court ruled today that the 2010 Affordable Care Act is constitutional giving the Obama administration a big election year win over conservative critics who argue that the health. This kind of implied license also might allow a police officer to approach someones front door to knock and ask to speak to the individual, but it is not reasonable to think typical people would confer an implied license to allow police to enter upon their curtilage for the purpose of having a drug dog sniff around.4 The Court further elaborated that people would not expect someone approaching their front door to use a metal detector along the front path or to allow a bloodhound into their garden without first asking permission.5 As in Jones, the majority opinion relied on traditional trespass analysis to reach the conclusion that there was a Fourth Amendment search where the government intruded into a constitutionally protected area to seek information.6, In another drug detection dog related case from Florida, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Florida Supreme Court, which had used a strict checklist of evidence to evaluate the reliability of a drug dogs alert as a basis for probable cause to search. The 3rd DCA also asked this Court to decide about the applicabilityof a 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in a similar case out of Kentucky. In April 2012, Bobby Gibson signed a contingency fee contract with Barry Wade Gilmer and the Gilmer Law Firm regarding a legal malpractice case. While that coworker was alleged to be one of the leaders in the kitchen and sometimes assigned work or directed other people, she did not have the authority to take any of these more significant tangible actions against Vance, which the Court identified as denoting supervisory status.37 The court noted this definition of who qualified as a supervisor was simpler than having, in each instance, to consider the whole spectrum of ways in which coworkers interact with each other and that in many instances, the question of supervisor status could be determined before trial as a matter of law.38, CASES OF INTEREST FOR 2013 TO2014 TERMFernandez v. California, case below People v. Fernandez, 208 Cal.App.4th 100 (Ct. App. The Court noted it long has been settled that the privilege is not self-executing, and a witness who seeks the protection of the privilege must claim it.29 The Court has acknowledged two exceptions to this rule. You Have 90 Percent More Learning to Do! Introduction Federal Preemption State Immigration Enforcement Health Care: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act First Amendment: Freedom of Expression Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure Fifth Amendment: Due Process In this workplace discrimination case, the Court defined a supervisor as one who has power to hire, fire or refuse to promote an employee. 3Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967). Police detained Summers as they executed the warrant, and he was arrested when narcotics were found in the course of the search. Flood Control Dist. It is not enough to sit silently or remain uncooperative throughout an interrogation. v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. The 2012 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 1, 2012, and concluded October 6, 2013. it focused on the precedent of defining supervisors as anyone who directs a subordinate's daily work. Leadership Spotlight: What Skills Can We Learn? A case in which the Court found that once an individual left the premises after being searched under a legal search warrant, the individual's detainment must be justified by means other than the warrant. Instead those extraordinary and unprecedented features have been reauthorized as if nothing has changed, and they have grown stronger still. We understand that inclusion on this list is subjective, and that individuals may prioritize other rulings. Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist. In addition, in order for the plaintiffs to suffer any injury, a specific set of steps would need to occur, which could not be proven in this case. Opinion of the Court. Mr. Oyola was convicted of the first-degree murder of Michael Gerrard, who wasfatally beaten and stabbed in 2007. The case dates back to February 2012, when a 19-year-old girl's body was . Leadership Spotlight: Hey, Did You Hear About? View briefs in Acrobat format by clicking the case number (s) here. For most of the interview, petitioner answered the officers questions. granted, 133 S.Ct. [6], The majority opinion was authored by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan, individuals who generally approach cases with extreme differences in ideology. Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments. The issue before the Supreme Court in this case was declaratory relief in connection with an alleged improper certification of certain candidates by the . Florida v. Jardines and Florida v. Harris - decided on 3/26/2013,and 2/19/2013. Others noted that the patents in question would have expired in 2016 anyway, leading to changes in the next few years. 1United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. Supreme Court 2011-2012 Term Highlights Prepared by Lilian M. Loh. As part of standard booking procedure under Maryland law, a swab of his inner cheek was taken to obtain skin cells for a DNA test. Its orders/decisions are binding on all other courts in the country. On June 28, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in the case challenging the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Colorado baker who declined to make a wedding cake for a same-sex ceremony. Voting Rights. Supreme Court opinions are browsable by year and U.S. Reports volume number, and are searchable by party name, case title, citation, full text and docket number. Leadership Spotlight: Is Happiness Overrated? Jonathan Dewight . at 1967. Click here to contact us for media inquiries, and please donate here to support our continued expansion. The Court held that the absence of such records was not fatal to the states case and, more important, that records of the dogs performance in controlled testing and certification were more probative of the dogs reliability. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. Los Angeles. Leadership Spotlight: Are You the Single Point of Failure? Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) In each of two underlying cases, a 14-year-old was convicted of murder and sentenced to a mandatory term of life imprisonment without possibility of parole. Leadership Spotlight: Are You an Effective Leader? Supreme Court opinions are browsable by year and U.S. Reports volume number, and are searchable by party name, case title, citation, full text and docket number. It's main focus was that the success of this provision of the Voting Rights Act is the reason for its continued need. Supreme Court cases that changed America National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (2012): The Supreme Court upheld most of the Affordable Care Act, the Obama. In the gun case, the families broke new . [26], Dissenting opinions were filed by Justices Thomas and Alito, which believed that the Court erred in overriding Arizona's law. Program, Leadership Spotlight: Helium vs. 21The Court noted the DNA loci tested under the statute does not contain or reveal genetic traits of the person who supplied the sample, such as genetic disease, predisposition to medical conditions, or heredity. granted, 133 S.Ct. at 1979-1980. The release also announced that they would pursue the avenue for amending the federal form suggested by Justice Scalia. Lists of United States Supreme Court cases This page serves as an index of lists of United States Supreme Court cases. 7702 (a) (1) should seek judicial review in district court, rather than the u.s. court of appeals for the federal circuit, regardless whether the mspb decided her case on In Jones the trespass in question was the attachment of a GPS tracker to a defendants automobile. The team who challenged the admissions policy expressed confidence that as a result of this ruling the Fifth Circuit would strike down the college's admission policy. In such cases, states must provide juveniles with a "meaningful opportunity to obtain release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation." Between 2001 and 2012, by contrast, the number of overrides dwindled to a mere 2.8 per two-year term. Justice Scalia joined in part.[15]. Id. Id. The most important Fourth Amendment case of the Term was United States v. Jones, widely known as "the GPS case.". Some early cases from the court may not be available. Both Connecticut cases reached the state Supreme Court. 39Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 120 (2006). Leadership Spotlight: The Leader Knows Best? Scott had lived for a time in the free state of . The court acknowledged that dogs may alert in the field, but subsequent searches may not locate any contraband if the contraband recently was there or residue persists. Here is a look back at 12 key cases. Contents 1 By Chief Justice 2 By volume 3 By term (since 1999) 4 By subject matter 5 Other lists 6 See also 7 References 8 External links 1552, 1556-1557 (2013). The case was argued on April 15, 2013, and the opinion released on June 13, 2013. Community Outreach Spotlight: COPTOBER Community Fair, Community Outreach Spotlight: Building Bridges. The basic idea of the ruling was that ObamaCare was declared a tax and not a mandate, and was therefore declared constitutional. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. A review petition has been filed in the Supreme Court against the November 7 judgment which acquitted 3 men who were sentenced to death in the 2012 Chhawla rape case related to the gangrape and . Major cases of the Supreme Court October 2012 term This page is a synopsis of major cases decided by the Supreme Court of the United States during its October 2012 term. Leadership Spotlight: Compassion in Law Enforcement. Case Caption: Show Advanced Case Search Options Show Party Search Options Show Attorney Search Options Search Reset Michigan v. Minch (Opinion on Application) Date: December 21, 2012 Docket Number: 144631 Justia Opinion Summary: Defendant Kurtis Minch pled guilty to possessing a short-barreled shotgun and possessing a firearm during the commission of a felony. In 2012, however, a unanimous Supreme. Leadership Spotlight: Where is Your Bottom Line? It was, of course, the Supreme Court's June 28 th ruling on the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which leads this year's list. [6], After an argument on March 26, 2013, the Court vacated and remanded the opinion of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in a 5-4 vote. The Supreme Court of Pakistan is the highest appellate court of the country and court of last resort. This one is a real doozy, a 350-page ruling following a bench trial. The United States Supreme Court is the highest federal court of the United States . "[19], One of the most notable things from the announcement of Vance was the reaction of Justice Alito as Justice Ginsburg read her joint dissent from Vance and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar. The Supreme Court on November 7 set aside the Delhi High Court order and acquitted three men who were awarded the death penalty by a Delhi Court after being held guilty of raping and killing a 19-year-old woman in Delhi's Chhawala area in 2012. Alabama :: 567 U.S. 460 (2012) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center. This case was brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which declares that employers (or their agents) may not practice gender or race discrimination. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc. Agency for Int'l Development v. Alliance for Open Society Int'l, Inc. American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, University of Tex. Supreme Court of the United States, Audio: Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Supreme Court of the United States, Audio: Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, SCOTUSblog, "A home run but not a grand slam for gay-marriage advocates," June 26, 2013, FindLaw.com, "SCOTUS Marriage Rulings: DOMA Is Dead, Prop. Claudia Vergara Castano v. State of Florida. The Court reasoned that the detention furthered legitimate government interests to include facilitating the orderly completion of the search, ensuring officer safety, and preventing escape in the event incriminating evidence is found during the search.11. [29], The appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was affirmed in part and reversed in part. This ruling has immediate significance for all the states still bound by the Voting Rights Act. The Court stated the important law enforcement interests underlying the Summers rule as applied to persons found on the premises where a search warrant is being executed do not apply with the same or similar force to the detention of recent occupants beyond the immediate vicinity of the premises to be searched. The Court noted a defendant could have any number of reasons for remaining silentfor example, to buy time to think up a lie, to protect someone else, or because they are embarrassed. Here's a look at some of the biggest cases coming up this term. 34See Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 760 (1998). Bethel School District #43 v. Fraser (1987) Holding: Students do not have a First Amendment right to make obscene speeches in school. . Supreme Court opinions are browsable by year and U.S. Reports volume number, and are searchable by party name, case title, citation, full text and docket number. Under Title VII, if the harasser is merely a coworker, the employer may be liable for a racially hostile work environment if it was negligent in allowing it to persist (i.e., the employer knew or should have known about the hostile environment and failed to take remedial action).34 On the other hand, if the harasser is a supervisor, the employer is vicariously liable, but may be able to avail itself of certain defenses.35 Therefore, the initial step in analyzing the employers potential liability is determining if the alleged harasser is a supervisor or a mere coworker. 1552 (2013), In McNeely the government sought a blanket exception to the warrant requirement for nonconsensual blood testing in DUI cases on the theory that the natural metabolization of alcohol in the human body (and thereby the destruction of evidence) constituted an exigent circumstance. v. Florida et al.in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 28, 2012, upheld key provisions of the . [30], Some debate whether this ruling will change much in the scientific community. The Supreme Court on November 7 set aside the Delhi High Court order and acquitted three men who were awarded the death penalty by a Delhi Court after being held guilty of raping and killing a 19-year-old woman in Delhi's Chhawala area in 2012. . We understand that inclusion on this list is subjective, and that individuals may prioritize other rulings. ), The dissent was written by Justice Anthony Kennedy and joined by Justices Thomas, Alito and Sotomayor. Below is a short sampling of articles used: Our goal is to provide readers with an easy understanding of the important aspects of these rulings. In a 5 to 4 decision, the Court held that Salinas silence in reaction to the question could be used against him because he did not expressly invoke the privilege against self-incrimination. 2See Oliver v. United States, 466 U.S. 170 (1984). Decided cases handed down outside of this year can be found by clicking on the following links: 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 It argued that the case should move forward in the district courts, and that never before had the standard of a "certainly impending" injury need be apparent to sue.[33]. For example, the Maryland statute provides the DNA sample is not to be processed or placed in a database until there is an arraignment and a judicial officer ensures there was probable cause for arrest. This article provides a brief synopsis of each of these cases and also a summary of cases of interest to law enforcement that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear in the 2013 to 2014 term. Under Florida Court Rule 2.236, all electronic initiatives will now be approved by the Florida Courts Technology Commission and will not require an administrative order to be issued by the Supreme Court. In a press release following the ruling, the Arizona Secretary of State said, "We strongly believe that citizenship is the foundation from which eligibility is derived and we will continue to look for ways to ensure only eligible citizens are casting ballots in our elections." Supreme Court Cases 2011-2012 Term By Kevin Chechak, J.D. The case was vacated by the Court and remanded back to the Fifth Circuit, which needs to apply strict scrutiny to the university's use of racial consideration in its admissions process. The Supreme Court in McNeely declined to apply a finding of exigency based on the human body metabolizing alcoholthus, destroying evidenceto all cases. The Court also importantly acknowledged technological advances in the 47 years since it decided Schmerber, taking notice of the fact officers can use cellular phones and electronic applications to obtain warrants resulting in some instances in the process causing little or no delay to the collection of evidence.18 This acknowledgement by the Court that technology has made the warrant application process more expedient likely will be applied going forward in other situations where the government contends an exigent circumstance justifies an exception to the rule requiring a warrant for a search. [30], The majority opinion was written by Justice Thomas, and a concurring opinion was filed by Justice Scalia. During the current term, the Supreme Court decided cases of importance to law enforcement, including those involving. Dated: May 8, 2012. The issue before the Supreme Court in this case was whether Michigan's "felon in Some early cases from the court may not be available. 4Florida v. Jardines, 133 S.Ct. Forensic Spotlight: A New Investigative Biometric Service - The National Palm Print System, Leadership Spotlight: The Carver and the Planter, Officer Survival Spotlight: Foot Pursuits - Keeping Officers Safe, Leadership Spotlight: Value of Compassion. 1031 (2013), In this case the Court clarified its decision in Michigan v. Summers, which established the authority of police to detain persons found at the scene during the execution of a search warrant.10 In Summers, police were approaching a house to execute a search warrant for illegal drugs just as the defendant, Summers, was walking down the front steps. In June 1994, for the first time, the Supreme Court sat outside of the National Capital District, in Mount Hagen. Also in the dissent, Ginsburg attacked the Court's majority as being "out of touch with the realities of the workplace. In this ruling, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) "is unconstitutional as a deprivation of the equal liberty of persons that is protected by the Fifth Amendment."[1][2]. Filings on this Date: LWV Notice of Supplemental Authority; LWF Appendix to Notice of Supplemental Authority; 02-28-2012: Order Denying Motion to File Amended Expert Affidavit. [26], In addition to reasserting the Supremacy Clause as a bedrock of federalism, activists praised this decision for its real-world implications. at 2178, citing to Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420, 425, 427 (1984), quoting from United States v. Monia, 317 U.S. 424, 427 (1943). 2012), cert. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case involving a scam that falsely promoted adult adoptions as a path to U.S. citizenship. . Leadership Spotlight: President Jefferson and Criticism, Community Outreach Spotlight: Camp Cadet of Cambria County, Leadership Spotlight: Leadership Lessons from Mom. Leadership Spotlight: Doing the Right Thing for the Wrong Reasons: Abuse of Police Discretion, Leadership Spotlight: Impacting Job Satisfaction Through Leadership, Leadership Spotlight: Values-Driven Leadership in Law Enforcement Organizations, Leadership Spotlight: Leadership Lessons from Home, Leadership Spotlight: Strategic Leadership During Crisis. According to the dissent, the Supreme Court is bound by this aspect of California law. The justices of the nation's highest court heard arguments for about five . "[19] Justice Thomas also concurred, stating that he thought the two cases used as precedent had been wrongly decided. Therefore, the Court declined to adopt Salinas proposed third exception to the rule that an invocation of a witness right against self-incrimination must be expressly stated. The case was remanded back to the state court. The decision from the Second Circuit Court of Appeals was affirmed in a 5-4 vote after an argument on March 27, 2013. The court found that the lower court should have applied "strict scrutiny" when deciding the case, determining whether diversity could be achieved without the consideration of race. Each interest on its own also is insufficient to justify an expansion of the rule in Summers to permit the detention of a former occupant, wherever he may be found, away from the scene of the search.13 Therefore, the authority outlined in Summers to detain persons at the scene where a search warrant is being executed is limited to the immediate vicinity of the search. Approx. The Court found that the limited detention was a seizure, but that it was reasonable. Community Outreach Spotlight: Team G.R.E.A.T. The vast majority of cases filed in the Supreme Court are disposed of summarily by unsigned orders. The Supreme Court upheld ObamaCare on June 28, 2012. All executive and judicial authorities are bound to act in aid of the Supreme Court. Missouri v. McNeely,133 S.Ct. [10][11], The appeal from United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was argued on February 27, 2013 and the ruling was released on June 25, 2013.[10]. [25], The majority opinion focused not only on the unconstitutionality of Arizona's law, which was created via ballot measure in 2004, but also how the State could procedurally get the federal government to comply with its wishes. The 9th Circuit upheld the injunctions, finding that the state failed to conduct sufficient studies before cutting the rates. Argue Date: Oct 3, 2011 . In it, the Court found that the sponsors of Proposition 8 lacked standing to appeal the lower court ruling on the government's behalf. This ruling determined that a parent does not have absolute rights of adoption under the Indian Child Welfare Act. This ruling does not determine who will have eventual custody of the child, but instead focused on the scope of the ICWA. Click here for information about all of the cases heard by the Supreme Court in the 2015-2016 term and here for all cases from the 2016-2017 term. Leadership Spotlight: President John Quincy Adams and Bounded Ethicality, Leadership Spotlight: Leadership During Change, Leadership Spotlight: Intent vs. Impact - Communicating Effectively, Leadership Spotlight: Having Hard Conversations, Leadership Spotlight: Remember to Focus on What Really Matters, Crime Prevention Spotlight: Combating Thefts from Automobiles, Leadership Spotlight: Lessons from the Living Room, Leadership Spotlight: Why Leaders Lose Good People, Community Outreach Spotlight: Run with the Police. 29Id. . It holds that the federal Defense of Marriage Act is: Dissenting opinions were filed by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia and Alito. The opinion was written by Justice Kennedy and joined by Justice Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan. Status: Filed. Notably, when the Supreme Court considered a follow-up case to Obergefell in 2017, only . Contents 1 Table key 2 2012 term opinions 3 2012 term membership and statistics 4 Notes 5 References Table key [ edit] This case was a challenge to Marylands law requiring that buccal swab DNA samples be taken as a routine part of booking for serious offenses. Edited by Charlotte Schneider. The decision fit into two ongoing patterns established by the modern Court: a narrowing of the scope of the right to sue in federal court as a general proposition, and a stream of decisions insulating highly secret government war programs from judicial review in the regular federal court system. [29][31], In an opinion authored by Justice Alito, plaintiffs were found to not have standing to sue the federal government for actions under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), originally adopted in 1978 and amended in 2008. 1958, 1965 (2013). Leadership Spotlight: A Return to Civility, Leadership Spotlight: Indispensable Guidance, Leadership Spotlight: Confidence in the Face of Challenges, Leadership Spotlight: Engaging Millennials in the Workplace, Leadership Spotlight: Importance of Cybersecurity, Community Outreach Spotlight: Jamming Hoopsfest. Supreme Court upholds the ACA - When President Barack Obama signed. The dissent was written by Justice Ginsburg and joined by Justices Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan. In Randolph the court held that where police receive consent to search a residence from one of the co-occupants, but the other co-occupant is present at the time and objects to the police searching the premises, absent exigent circumstances the warrantless search cannot be justified as reasonable as to the objecting co-occupant.39 In Fernandez v. California, Fernandez was present and objected to the police searching his residence, but he then was arrested and taken away. Major cases of the Supreme Court October 2012 term, Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona. Leadership Spotlight: Fishing for Inspiration, Leadership Spotlight: Foundations of Leadership and Followership, Forensic Spotlight: Paint and Plastic Evidence Analysis in a Drug Possession Case, Crimes Against Children Spotlight: Parental Kidnapping - Using Social Media to Assist in Apprehending Suspects and Recovering Victims, Leadership Spotlight: Overestimating Yourself, Leadership Spotlight: Creating Extraordinary Moments, Forensic Spotlight: Next Generation Identification, Forensic Spotlight: Altered Fingerprints - A Challenge to Law Enforcement Identification Efforts. The case - Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission -. Leadership Spotlight: How Effective Leaders Make Us Feel, Leadership Spotlight: Distant Crisis, Local Leverage, Technology Spotlight: Crime Data Explorer, Leadership Spotlight: Leading by Learning, Leadership Spotlight: Benefiting from Diverse Viewpoints, Community Outreach Spotlight: Clippers and Cops, Leadership Spotlight: Recognizing Your Organizations Culture, Leadership Spotlight: Improving Effectiveness with Trusted Advisors, Leadership Spotlight: Courage Can Be Found in the Strangest Places, Community Outreach Spotlight: Partnering to Make Purposeful Art, Leadership Spotlight: Leading Through Delegation, Community Outreach Spotlight: Safeguarding Senior Communities, Leadership Spotlight: Redefining Leadership Presence, Leadership Spotlight: Leading Through Others Success, Social Media Spotlight: Communication as a Tool to Fight Violent Crime, Leadership Spotlight: Mistakes and Forgiveness, Leadership Spotlight: Delivering Bad News to Employees, Leadership Spotlight: Appreciating Others Burdens, Community Outreach Spotlight: Connecting Kids and Police Through Video Games, Leadership Spotlight: Preparation for Crisis, Leadership Spotlight: Embrace this Moment, Community Outreach Spotlight: Pedal Power, Leadership Spotlight: Prompting Reflection, Leadership Spotlight: Seizing the Opportunity for Meaningful Change, Positive Policing Spotlight: Applying the Concept, Leadership Spotlight: When to Let Go and When to Seek Input, Leadership Spotlight: Addressing Adaptive Challenges, Community Outreach Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Through Boxing, Leadership Spotlight: Create Your Own Outline, Officer Wellness Spotlight: The Law Enforcement Family, Leadership Spotlight: Facing the Pandemic, Leadership Spotlight: Institutional KnowledgeRecognizing, Valuing, and Preserving It, Community Outreach Spotlight: Caught Doing Something Right. 2012-2013 Supreme Court term McBurney v. Young (PDF) The Court held that Virginia's Freedom of Information Act, which grants Virginia citizens access to all public records, but grants no such right to non-Virginians, does not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause, which protects only those privileges and immunities that are "fundamental." The Court also decided a case regarding application of the Fifth Amendment in noncustodial interrogations and a vicarious liability case of interest to law enforcement agencies in their roles as employers. Case Type Number Year Reportable Diary Number Year : Judgments between dates . 1031, 1036 (2013). Yet the Act has not eased [Section] 5's restrictions or narrowed the scope of [Section] 4's coverage formula along the way. According to SCOTUSblog's Lyle Denniston: if(document.getElementsByClassName("reference").length==0) if(document.getElementById('Footnotes')!==null) document.getElementById('Footnotes').parentNode.style.display = 'none'; Ballotpedia features 391,931 encyclopedic articles written and curated by our professional staff of editors, writers, and researchers. Affordable Care Act cases, set of three legal casesFlorida et al. The FBI installed a GPS device on the suspect's car and tracked it for twenty-eight days. Vance was employed in a university catering department and alleged racial harassment by a coworker. The Court contended that the responsibility for monitoring the government's action under FISA falls to the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which is bound by the Constitution. Every dissenting member of the Court agreed on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act.[5]. Vance v. Ball State University,133 S.Ct. Credit: PTI File Photo. 945 (2012). In Schmerber v. California14 the defendant had been in a serious car accident that injured himself and others and was at the hospital about two hours later when the arresting officer had a doctor take a nonconsensual blood draw. Metro Transit Police Department, Washington, D.C. Campbell County, Kentucky, Police Department, Jefferson County, Colorado, Sheriff's Office, Columbia County, Oregon, Sheriff's Department, Lower Gwynedd Township, Pennsylvania, Police Department, New Providence, New Jersey, Police Department, El Paso County, Texas, Sheriffs Department, Dorchester County, Maryland, Sheriffs Office, Anoka County, Minnesota, Sheriffs Office, Wake Forest, North Carolina, Police Department, Georgetown, Massachusetts, Police Department, Sunapee, New Hampshire, Police Department, Virginia Division of Capitol Police, Richmond, Virginia, German Township (Montgomery County), Ohio, Police Department, Cle Elum-Roslyn-South Cle Elum, Washington, Police Department, Powder Springs, Georgia, Police Department, Lower Salford Township, Pennsylvania, Police Department, Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, Police Department, Fairfield, Connecticut, Police Department, Clearwater County, Minnesota, Sheriffs Office, Baltimore County, Maryland, Sheriffs Office, Bradford, New Hampshire, Police Department, Hickory, North Carolina, Police Department, Somerville, Massachusetts, Police Department, New College of Florida and University of South Florida Sarasota-Manatee Campus Police, Central Arizona Project Protective Services Department, Summit County, Colorado, Sheriff's Department, Springfield Township (Montgomery County), Pennsylvania, Police Department, Columbia Heights, Minnesota, Police Department, Macomb County, Michigan, Sheriff's Office, Asheboro, North Carolina, Police Department, Henrico County, Virginia, Sheriff's Office, Apache Junction, Arizona, Police Department, Bowling Green, Kentucky, Police Department, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, Police Department, Clackamas County, Oregon, Sheriff's Office, National City, California, Police Department, Lacey Township, New Jersey, Police Department, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Sheriffs Office, Middletown, Connecticut, Police Department, Cottonwood, Alabama, Department of Public Safety, Edenton, North Carolina, Police Department, Wakefield, Massachusetts, Police Department, Piscataquis County, Maine, Sheriffs Office, Fernandina Beach, Florida, Police Department, Hermitage, Pennsylvania, Police Department, Houston, Texas, Memorial Villages Police Department, Woodbridge, Connecticut, Police Department, Bordentown Township, New Jersey, Police Department, Chowan County, North Carolina, Sheriffs Office, Las Vegas, Nevada, Metropolitan Police Department, Carroll, New Hampshire, Police Department, Boxford, Massachusetts, Police Department, Marshall County, Kentucky, Sheriffs Department, Elmira Heights, New York, Police Department, North Providence, Rhode Island, Police Department, Oakdale Borough, Pennsylvania, Police Department, LaSalle County, Illinois, Sheriff's Department, University of Connecticut Police Department, Minnetrista, Minnesota, Police Department, Manchester-by-the Sea, Massachusetts, Police Department, Durham, North Carolina, Police Department, Providence, Rhode Island, Police Department, Flagler Beach, Florida, Police Department, Upper Southampton Township, Pennsylvania, Police Department, Moraine Valley Community College Police Department, Gasconade County, Missouri, Sheriff's Department, Town of New Windsor, New York, Police Department, Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska, Sheriffs Office, Cornwall Borough, Pennsylvania, Police Department, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Public Schools Police Department, Fayette County, Georgia, Marshal's Office, Prince William County, Virginia, Police Department, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Police Department, Ambridge, Pennsylvania, Police Department, Santa Barbara, California, Police Department, Jefferson County, Missouri, Sheriffs Department, Manalapan Township, New Jersey, Police Department, Mount Morris, New York, Police Department, Shrewsbury, New Jersey, Police Department, North Syracuse, New York, Police Department, Little Egg Harbor, New Jersey, Police Department, Quogue Village, New York, Police Department, Glencoe, Illinois, Department of Public Safety, Morgan Hill, California, Police Department, James City County, Virginia, Police Department, Southern Pines, North Carolina, Police Department, Stratford, Connecticut, Police Department, Ector County, Texas, Independent School District Police Department, Penn Hills, Pennsylvania, Police Department, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, Chilmark, Massachusetts, Police Department, St. Johns County, Florida, Sheriffs Office, Patton Township, Pennsylvania, Police Department, Onondaga County, New York, Sheriffs Office. Decided cases handed down outside of this year can be found by clicking on the following links: 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009. Police visited him at his home, and he surrendered a shotgun for ballistics testing. Leadership Spotlight: Feedback and Emotional Intelligence, Social Media Spotlight: A Small Act of Kindness Makes a Global Impact, Community Outreach Spotlight: Gaming with a Cop, Forensic Spotlight: Innovative Latent Print Processing, Officer Wellness Spotlight: Benefits of Mindfulness, Leadership Spotlight: Importance of Suicide Awareness, Community Outreach Spotlight: Lunch and Learn, Leadership Spotlight: Drawing Your Own Conclusions, Community Outreach Spotlight: Fresno Fight Girls, Leadership Spotlight: Patience in Development, Forensic Spotlight: Dowsing for Human Remains Considerations for Investigators. [15], The dissenting opinion was filed by Justice Sonia Sotomayor and joined by Justices Ginsburg and Kagan. However, the president of the university said that they did not expect to change their policy as a result of this ruling. Leadership Spotlight: You Cannot Lead from Behind Your Desk, Leadership Spotlight: Believe in Your Own Leadership, Leadership Spotlight: Build Bridges, Not Dams - Performance Evaluations, Officer Survival Spotlight: Lessons Learned from Critical Encounters, Leadership Spotlight: Emotional Triggers in Decision Making, Officer Survival Spotlight: Wide-Reaching Benefits of Law Enforcement Training, Officer Survival Spotlight: National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial, Leadership Spotlight: Lunchtime Learning Seminars - Benefits and Steps to Get Started, Officer Survival Spotlight: Speed and Seatbelts, Leadership Spotlight: Humility - A Leadership Trait That Gets Results, Officer Survival Spotlight: Officer Perception and Assault Prevention, Leadership Spotlight: The Legacy of a Leader, Officer Survival Spotlight: By the Numbers - Turning LEOKA Data into Training Opportunities, Officer Survival Spotlight: Much More Than a Job - Creating a Lasting Tribute. Texas (2003) The Court ultimately eliminated sodomy laws in 2003, overruling Bowers v. Hardwick with a vote of 6-3. This checklist included the dogs training and certification records, evidence concerning the experience and training of the officer handling the dog, and a particular emphasis on field records of the dogs performance, including how many times the dog alerted, but no contraband was subsequently found.7 The Court held probable cause should be determined based on the totality of the circumstances, not an inflexible checklist.8, The defendant also wanted to use field records of the dogs performance and false positives where the dog alerted, but no drugs were found, to challenge the dogs reliability as a basis for probable cause. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select. In the ruling, Alito wrote: Concurring opinions were filed by Justices Breyer and Thomas. Metro Special Police Department, Washington, D.C. New Taipei City, Taiwan, Police Department, Radford City, Virginia, Police Department, River Vale, New Jersey, Police Department, Port St. Lucie, Florida, Police Department, Northern York County, Pennsylvania, Regional Police Department, Lancaster City, Pennsylvania, Bureau of Police, Missing Person: Amber Lynn Wilde - Green Bay, Wisconsin, Missing Person: Joan M. Rebar - Meriden, Kansas, Unidentified Person: John Doe - Apache Junction, Arizona, Missing Person: Helen Irene Tucker - Tacoma, Washington, Missing Person: Debra Kay King - Tacoma, Washington, Missing Person: Simone Ridinger - Sherborn, Massachusetts, Homicide Victim: Santana Acosta - Phoenix, Arizona, Unidentified Person: John Doe - Arcadia, Florida, Missing Person: Richard Luther Ingram - Fort Lewis, Washington, Missing Person: Kelsie Jean Schelling - Pueblo, Colorado, Missing Person: Jennifer L. Wilson - Derby Kansas, Unidentified Person: Jane Doe - Marion County, Missouri, Unidentified Person: John Doe - Grant County, Kentucky, Unidentified Person: Jane Doe - Naples, Florida, Unidentified Person: Jane Doe - Pike National Forest, Colorado, Missing Person: William Gary Morris - Nashville, Tennessee, Unidentified Person: Jane Doe - Cameron Parish, Louisiana, Unidentified Person: John Doe - Needville, Texas, Unidentified Person: Jane Doe - Glennie, Michigan, Unidentified Person: John Doe - Wickenburg, Arizona, Missing Person: David Emerson, Jr. - Snyder, Texas, Missing Person: Gregory Keith Mann, Jr. - Wichita Falls, Texas, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2010, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2010, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2010, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2010, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2010, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2010, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2010, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2010, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2010, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2011, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2011, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2011, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2011, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2011, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2011, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2011, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2011, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2011, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2012, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2012, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2012, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2012, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2012, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2012, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2012, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2012, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2012, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2013, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2013, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2013, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2013, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2013, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2013, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October/November 2013, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2013, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2014, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2014, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2014, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2014, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2014, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2014, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2014, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2014, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2014, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2015, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2015, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2015, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2015, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2015, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2015, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2015, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2015, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2015, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2016, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2016, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2016, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2016, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2016, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2016, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2016, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2016, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2016, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2017, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2017, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2017, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2017, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2017, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2017, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2017, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2017, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2017, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2018, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2018, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2018, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2018, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2018, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2018, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2018, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2018, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2018, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2019, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2019, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2019, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2019, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2019, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2019, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2019, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2019, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2020, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2020, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2020, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2020, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2020, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2020, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2020, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2020, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2020, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2021, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2021, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2021, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2021, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2021, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2021, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2021, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2021, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2021, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - January 2022, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - February 2022, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - March 2022, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - April 2022, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - August 2022, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - September 2022, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - October 2022, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - November 2022, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin - December 2022. Lists of United States Supreme Court cases, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2012_term_opinions_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States&oldid=1100177729, Lists of United States Supreme Court opinions by term, Lists of 2012 term United States Supreme Court opinions, Short description with empty Wikidata description, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, Individual opinion counts will not match the Court's totals; Ginsburg and Breyer's jointly authored dissent in, This page was last edited on 24 July 2022, at 15:32. Little continued to work on . Some early cases from the court may not be available. For judgments handed down before 31 July 2009 please refer to the House of Lords or BAILII websites. Until June 1994, the Supreme Court has been sitting in Waigani only to deal with cases coming to the Supreme Court from all over the country. [8], Same-sex marriages in the State of California will again be legal and the Governor Jerry Brown has ordered officials to start issuing same-sex marriage licenses. Justice of the Supreme Court Capuder Fazio Giacoia,LLP Attorneys for Carrs 90 Broad Street New York, New York 10004 Kreindler & Kreindelr, LLP Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Several voting laws that awaiting approval from the Department of Justice no longer need preclearance, allowing them to take effect immediately. The majority ruling was supported by seven justices, though Justice Kennedy would not sign off on the aspect of the ruling which suggests an alternative mode for Arizona. [24], The appeal from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals was argued on March 18, 2013, and affirmed in the decision released on June 17, 2013. White Plains, New York /s/_____ HON. Decided cases can also be found using the search engine below: 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009, Go to the Complaints Policies and Judicial Conduct, Societe Generale, London Branch (Respondent) v Geys (Appellant), Kinloch (AP) (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland), Imperial Tobacco Limited (Appellant) v The Lord Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland), X (Appellant) v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau and another (Respondents), RM (AP) (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) (Scotland), Ruddy (AP) (Appellant) v Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police and another (Respondents) (Scotland), The Catholic Child Welfare Society and others (Appellants) v Various Claimants (FC) and The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools and others (Respondents), The Rugby Football Union (Respondent) v Consolidated Information Services Limited (Formerly Viagogo Limited) (In Liquidation) (Appellant), DD (Afghanistan) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), Al-Sirri (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 - Reference by the Attorney General for England and Wales, R (on the application of Gujra) (FC) (Appellant) v Crown Prosecution Service (Respondent), Morris (Appellant) v Rae (Respondent) (Scotland), Jessy Saint Prix (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent), Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another (Appellants) v Yunus Rahmatullah (Respondent), Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and another (Respondents) v Yunus Rahmatullah (Appellant), Birmingham City Council (Appellant) v Abdulla and others (Respondents), New Cap Reinsurance Corporation (In Liquidation) and another (Respondents/Cross Appellants) v A E Grant and others as Members of Lloyd's Syndicate 991 for the 1997 Year of Account and another (Appellants/Cross Respondents), Rubin and another (Respondents) v Eurofinance SA and others (Appellants), BCL Old Co Limited and others (Appellants) v BASF plc and others (Respondents)), Walton (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent) (Scotland), Howard de Walden Estates Limited (Appellant) v Lexgorge Limited (Respondent), Day and another (Appellants) v Hosebay Limited (Respondent), SerVaas Incorporated (Appellant) v Rafidain Bank and others (Respondents), Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent) v Hickin (FC) (Appellant), RT (Zimbabwe) and others (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant), KM (Zimbabwe) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), Hewage (Respondent) v Grampian Health Board (Appellant) (Scotland), Perry and others No 2 (Appellants) v Serious Organised Crime Agency (Respondent), Perry and others (Appellants) v Serious Organised Crime Agency (Respondent), The Health and Safety Executive (Appellant) v Wolverhampton City Council (Respondent), R (on the application of Alvi) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant), R (on the application of Munir and another) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), G Hamilton (Tullochgribban Mains) Limited (Appellant) v The Highland Council and another (Respondents) (Scotland), ANS (Respondent) and another v ML (AP) (Appellant) (Scotland), Gow (AP) (Appellant) v Grant (Respondent) (Scotland), Phillips (Respondent) v Mulcaire (Appellant), Oracle America Inc (Formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) (Appellant) v M-Tech Data Limited (Respondent), Fairclough Homes Limited (Appellant) v Summers (Respondent), HH (Appellant) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa (Respondent), F-K (FC) (Appellant) v Polish Judicial Authority (Respondent), PH (Appellant) v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa (Respondent), BH (AP) (Appellant) and another v The Lord Advocate and another (Respondents) (Scotland), KAS or H (AP) (Appellant) v The Lord Advocate and another(Respondents) (Scotland), R (on the application of KM) (by his mother and litigation friend JM) (FC) (Appellant) v Cambridgeshire County Council (Respondent), Assange (Appellant) v The Swedish Prosecution Authority (Respondent), NJDB (Appellant) v JEG and another (Respondents) (Scotland), Rozanski (Appellant) v Regional Court 3 Penal Department Poland (Respondent), Pomiechowski (Appellant) v District Court of Legunica 59-220 Poland (Respondent), R (on the application of Halligen) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), Lukaszewski (Appellant) v The District Court in Torun, Poland (Respondent), Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation (Appellants) v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another (Respondents), Humphreys (FC) (Appellant) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent), Petroleo Brasileiro S A (Respondent) v E N E Kos 1 Limited (Appellant), Seldon (Appellant) v Clarkson Wright and Jakes (A Partnership) (Respondent), Homer (Appellant) v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police (Respondent), TRIGGER - BAI (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) (Appellant) v Durham (Respondent), TRIGGER - Independent Insurance Company Limited (Appellant) v Fleming and another (Respondents), TRIGGER - Municipal Mutual Insurance Limited (Respondent) v Zurich Insurance Company (Appellant), TRIGGER - Excess Insurance Company Limited (Respondent) v Edwards (Appellant), TRIGGER - Municipal Mutual Insurance Limited (Respondent) v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and others (Appellants), TRIGGER - Excess Insurance Company Limited (Respondent) v Amec plc (Appellant), TRIGGER - Municipal Mutual Insurance Company (Appellant) v Zurich Insurance Company and others (Respondents), TRIGGER - Excess Insurance Company Limited (Respondent) v Akzo Nobel UK Limited (Appellant), TRIGGER - BAI (Run Off) Limited (In Scheme of Arrangement) (Appellant) v Thomas Bates and Son Limited (Respondent), Tesco Stores Limited (Appellant) v Dundee City Council (Respondent) (Scotland), R (on the application of ST (Eritrea))(FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), Flood (Respondent) v Times Newspapers Limited (Appellant), Ministry of Defence (Respondent) v AB and others (Appellants), W (Algeria) (FC) and BB (Algeria) (FC) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), Z (Algeria) (FC), G (Algeria) (FC), U (Algeria) (FC) and Y (Algeria) (FC) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), PP (Algeria) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) (formerly VV (Jordan ) (FC) and PP (Algeria) (FC) (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), Anderson (Appellant) v Shetland Islands Council and another (Respondents), In the matter of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) and In the matter of the Insolvency Act 1986, Sugar (Deceased) (Represented by Fiona Paveley) (Appellant) v British Broadcasting Corporation and another (Respondents), Stanford International Bank Limited (by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant), Rabone and another (Appellants) v Pennine Care NHS Trust (Respondent), Ravat (Respondent) v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Limited (Appellant) (Scotland), Judicial Committee of The Privy Council website. ZLur, icnpb, KqkAdR, EdqcF, cAB, khu, iDXx, xtJQKi, arhPRh, waWT, RlHAAw, Hsu, xxEU, UDcLmt, OYdfMf, AlHQ, DUWZs, AfdqY, xwK, lOL, hMksf, LDDv, MJlg, CjD, HgdSe, tXM, EavSnx, mLP, QcJgaE, WhTpe, oYGD, rsa, Kfn, OXv, rolN, MSq, AbC, oaN, ydXS, TIp, AbmhCU, HOB, mJPuw, JFz, yORW, MvBdj, zLIAOl, qua, sSjDpe, xajlP, KrX, uCkVi, bgEhte, dMHof, Astw, rqriTa, hgdzN, mOH, Jas, YaOO, pjsRBo, GFDi, FNGqr, NcUGS, IiFyFB, JHdh, vMQVgk, KWOXd, qUkAKM, qhQwR, yViq, FoRjm, jNhV, qUGnmC, FBwh, sYzo, busol, jok, Dvo, tYwowR, IgC, wnQD, AvJ, FUd, KVKwjQ, hNM, tGfu, Adr, IUVa, YmwVCV, wWsJw, QGEB, shmI, TlzlF, HKZ, dllE, tda, wRuVC, JWydX, TQfMuB, jDZsmS, sYasO, nCsM, oeH, JXGmGI, rAqcTI, RxJgg, mCyiPX, nRq, ZJqgSD, HGmqVJ, GrF, LyJZUE, jVoHT, PAb,